Hi Heiko,
I've just completed the update for this section: I've added also a link
in the page to the table with all parameters.
Anyway parameters for peaking BG with non-BBbar mixed in have larger
error, and the 1 sigma region covers the values found on MC without non
BBbar.
They look very similar to me.
Antonio
Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> concerning the fits for the peaking BG shape parameters:
> What is the difference in the shape parameters wrt the
> fit w/o the non-BBbar mixed in?
>
> Cheers,
> Heiko
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>> 1) For the MC fit including non-BBbar events:
>>> Provide scaled signal yield numbers such that we can compare the
>>> fit result directly with the expected numer of signal events
>> I have reweighted non BBbar MC to BBbar MC lumonisity for a direct
>> comparison of yields. Result of the fit on this MC sample is on the
>> usual web page (www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html)
>>
>> Ciao,
>> Antonio
>>
|