Hi Antionio,
that looks now much better.
What is not cleat to me is your statement
that now it is 'non extended chi^2 fit'.
Could you please explain what you mean?
Cheers,
Heiko
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
> I was just finishing the update of this section....
>
>
> > I have just seen that there is something new.
> >
> > * You say that it is now a non-extended chi^2 fit.
> > Could you please give some technical details?
> > Also, it would be interesting to see the fitted
> > parameters.
> >
> Now the table is complete!
>
> > * Should we compare these results with the ones
> > posted at April 12th?
>
> No, those are wrong since there is no scaling with the errors.
>
> >
> > * Could you please post on your webpage somewhere
> > the numbers of entries in the histo for
> > a) data
> > b) MC
> >
> Sure, I added these informations right below the title.
> I write them also here:
>
> a) data = 437889
> b) MC = 1561024
>
> > * It might be also helpful to provide the sum of the
> > fitted yields in order to see how it compares to the
> > number of entries in the histo.
> >
> Ok, I will add this now.
>
> Bye,
> Antonio
>
> > Cheers,
> > Heiko
>
|