Hi Jochen, all,

in that case we should for the AWG page to be updated and than update VVF
accordingly I guess... otherwise we will just produce a lot of 3d
weights and not really use them anyway.

Cheers,
Kerstin

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Jochen Dingfelder wrote:

>
> Hi Kerstin,
>
> I think the currently best BF measurement for B->omegalnu comes from
> Belle: (1.3 +/-0.4 +/-0.2 +/-0.3) x 10^-4. This measurement has only 22%
> rel. uncertainty, compared to the 100% uncertainty we quote on the
> AWG reweighting page, where due to ignorance the omega BF was simply set
> equal to the rho0 BF.
> We should update all the BF tables on the SL AWG web page soon!
>
> Cheers,
> Jochen
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recognized that we do the following reweighting for B->omega l nu
> > events:
> >
> > # B- -> omega0 l- nubar + CC
> > 1.03  #1.34/1.3;
> >
> > according to wfermifile.dat (but we had this number already when it was
> > hardcoded in VirClass::Loop). The AWG reweighting page gives 1.45 as the
> > new central value to be obtained by reweighting. Is the above a typo or is
> > anyone aware of any reason why we else we might be using a different value
> > than suggested at the AWG reweighting page? Or were there changes to the
> > page you are aware of?
> >
> > If I do not hear anything to the contrary I will assume this to be a typo
> > and fix it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kerstin
> >
> >
> >
>