Hi Kerstin,
> in that case we should for the AWG page to be updated and than update VVF
> accordingly I guess... otherwise we will just produce a lot of 3d
> weights and not really use them anyway.
You're right, that would probably be the best solution ...
I would propose using the values from the winter 06 HFAG page
(averages if available, otherwise best measurements):
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/semi/winter06/winter06.shtml
pilnu -> HFAG average
rholnu -> BABAR Phys .Rev. D72, 051102 (2005)
omega -> Belle Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:131803 (2004)
eta -> CLEO Phys. Rev. D 68, 072003 (2003)
eta' -> = eta (but 100% error)
a,b,f,... -> 0
non res -> incl. - excl.
Does anybody have a different opinion?
Ciao,
Jochen
|