Hi Antonio,
concerning the fits for the peaking BG shape parameters:
What is the difference in the shape parameters wrt the
fit w/o the non-BBbar mixed in?
Cheers,
Heiko
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > 1) For the MC fit including non-BBbar events:
> > Provide scaled signal yield numbers such that we can compare the
> > fit result directly with the expected numer of signal events
>
> I have reweighted non BBbar MC to BBbar MC lumonisity for a direct
> comparison of yields. Result of the fit on this MC sample is on the
> usual web page (www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html)
>
> Ciao,
> Antonio
>
|