Hi,
I forgot to mention that the particpants agreed
on a phone meeting on Monday, noon, European time.
I'll call them. If there other intersted parties
let me know. Then it might be easier to have a
phone conference.
Cheers,
Heiko
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a short summary of the phone meeting.
>
> Participants: Wolfgang, Antonio, Concezio, Heiko
>
> * We observe a 3.7% bias for signal in the full MC fit.
> * The Argus parameters found in the full MC fit and in the
> fit of combinatoric+peaking BG including non-BBbar events
> are different.
> * The peaking BG yield for the combinatoric+peaking BG fit
> is different between using only BBbar or BBbar+non-BBbar.
>
> Since we do not know how to fix the peaking BG yield in the
> fit on data we decide to freeze our fit configuration as it
> is and will determine with extreme choices how the ratio of
> BR is influenced.
>
> Nevertheless Antonio will go on to understand further what's
> going on:
> 1) Repeat the full MC fit with the ARGUS parameter fixed to
> the one found on the fit in combinatoric+peaking BG including
> non-BBbar events
> We should then find a signal yield in much better agreement
> with the expected yield.
> 2) Perform a fit with all cuts applied.
>
> Wolfgang:
> 1) Provide a VVF-tag by today
> 2) Fix p* problem (hopefully until tomorrow)
>
> Chukwudi would the supposed to perform the mm2 scans tomorrow
>
> Heiko: Inform the convenors about the status.
>
> Cheers,
> Heiko
>
|