LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  May 2006

VUB-RECOIL May 2006

Subject:

Re: pstartfactor reweighting

From:

Wolfgang Menges <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

23 May 2006 08:15:50 -0700 (PDT)Tue, 23 May 2006 08:15:50 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (112 lines)

Hi Concezio,

On Tue, 23 May 2006, Concezio Bozzi wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> technically speaking, I think that the pstarsample dataset, already
> implemented in VVF by Roberto, does what you need. That dataset contains
> vcb and vub events from the same ntuples (generic MC), and the vub
> events are reweighted as usual, except the magic k factors which are
> used to normalize generic MC and signal MC to the same luminosity. So if
> you compute the pstarfactor from the pstarsample you should be done.

Well, yes, I am looking at Roberto's code, but there was at least one bug,
and then the problem of non-resonant reweigting. It is the generic sample,
and this is already weighted at production time. If you just reweight it
again, that is clearly wrong.

I thought the magic k factor is only needed to normalise the resonant
signal MC sample to the non-resonant signal MC sample.

Cheers,

	Wolfgang

> The trick with the total charmless BF is the following. When you apply
> the reweighting to the non-resonant MC you also inflate at the same time
> the non-resonant BF in MC, which is a factor ~2 lower than what we see
> in data. Indeed, different weight files were produced in the past which
> correspond to different values for the total b->ulnu BF, as measured
> e.g. in the mX, or the q2-El, or the endpoint analyses. For this reason,
> after reweighting non-resonant events and rescaled resonant BFs, the
> BF(B->ulnu) which you need in order to obtain the pstarfactor is the one
> corresponding to the weight files you are using. Last time we used a set
> of weights corresponding to BF(B->ulnu)=0.00224, the PRL mX result.
>
> A small complication arises when doing the unfolding. In this case the
> formula for the pstarfactor should have the PBF(B->ulnu), due to the
> kinematic cuts. In other words, you should multiply BF(B->ulnu) by the
> DFN acceptance. You get the latter from getEffFromDFN in VirUtil in the
> 1D case, or from getEffFromDFN2D in the 2D case.
>
> Talk to you later, Concezio.
>
>
> Wolfgang Menges wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >	I am a bit stuck with the pstartfactor calculation. Well, it is
> >not the actually calculation but the reweighting of the data sample. I
> >will outline in this mail the problem and we can discuss it in todays
> >meeting.
> >
> >The p*factor is calculated from generic BB sample. This sample is used for
> >the Vcb AND Vub components which avoids to fix (or know) the ratio between
> >the two samples. The P*factor is then quite simple:
> >
> >   e^u_t e^u_l       N^u_l     BF(B->clv)
> > --------------- =  ------- * ------------
> >  e^sl_t e^sl_l      N^sl_l    BF(B->ulv)
> >
> >The sample has the same luminosity and cross section for B->clv and
> >B->ulv. So, that's easy.
> >
> >Now the difficult part. For the Vub component, we like to apply the usual
> >reweighting, that means rescaling the resonant decays and reweighting the
> >non-resonant part. Rescaling the resonant decays is straight forward as
> >the BF in generic and signal MC are the same. The other part is the tricky
> >part.
> >
> >First, the generic non-resonant part is already reweighted. Here I can
> >take the weights from the MC production and reweight the distribution to
> >an unweighted one. Then I can apply the standard weights used also for the
> >MC signal sample.
> >
> >Second, how do I fix the total b->ulv BF or how do I get the total b->ulv
> >BF? Maybe the later approach is easier. I can sum the new BF for the
> >resonant decays. This gives me the exclusive BF. How to I get the
> >inclusive BF? Are the weights normalised in such a way that the inclusive
> >BF will remain invariant?
> >
> >Any comments on this?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >	Wolfgang
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Wolfgang Menges
> >Queen Mary, University of London                 SLAC, MS 35
> >Mile End Road                                    2575 Sand Hill Road
> >London, E1 4NS, UK                               Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
> >++44 20 7882 3753                                ++1 650 926 8503
> >                                                 [log in to unmask]
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Menges
Queen Mary, University of London                 SLAC, MS 35
Mile End Road                                    2575 Sand Hill Road
London, E1 4NS, UK                               Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
++44 20 7882 3753                                ++1 650 926 8503
                                                 [log in to unmask]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use