Hi Antonio,
that looks quite good wrt the fitted event yield on MC and also wrt to the
pulls in data fit. I would vote to stick to this fit configuration and
move on so that we can check now if a MM2 scan shows reasonable stability
in the BF extraction.
A few questions:
1) Do you have also a non-extended chi^2 fit on data?
2) I'm a bit surprised when comparing your fit on data with the plot shown
at April 19: The statistics is not exactly the same (order 20% difference).
Why is that?
3) In addition, the deviation in the plot of April 19 looks worse.
However, the chi^2 of that fit is significantly better compared to the
current number of 6.48. Do we understand why?
4) Do we need a crosscheck wrt different run periods?
I.e. check if the machinery works when fitting on Run1/2, Run3 and
Run4?
Cheers,
Heiko
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just updated the web page with latest results:
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html
>
> Have a nice weekend
>
> Antonio
>
|