Thanks for checking!
Now I will stop bothering you.
Cheers,
sheila
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi Sheila,
>
> there are mistakes in table 7, 8, 9 (in the BAD 1383 v.3): the value of
> sigma_L for the signal function reported in the tables are in GeV, not
> in MeV....
>
> Actually I fixed these tables but only in the CVS version of the BAD.
>
> Thank you for spotting all these mistakes!
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
> >
> > Hi! Thanks for answering that. I am pretty sure it is supposed
> > to have an "n", because otherwise the matching at the boundaries
> > doesn't work. Anyway, that's what's in the VirVubFitter.
> >
> > Now all that remains is my second question, which I
> > have pasted below:
> >
> > (2) The signal function drawn in Figure 4 LOOKS like it has:
> >
> > * x_c ~ 5.28 GeV = 5280 MeV
> > * (alpha*sigma_l) ~ 1 GeV = 1000 MeV
> > * sigma_l ~ sigma_R1, sigma_R2
> >
> > However, according to Table 7:
> >
> > * x_c = 5.2795 GeV = 5279.5 MeV
> > * (alpha*sigma_l) = 0.000008484 GeV = 0.008484 MeV
> > * sigma_l << sigma_R1, sigma_R2
> >
> > I tried to check by plotting the function with the
> > given fit parameters in ROOT, but it did not work
> > because ROOT could not handle the exponential
> > of (x - x_c)/sigma_l, since sigma_l is so tiny.
> >
> > Am I missing something, or is there a mistake, or what?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > sheila
> >
> >
>
|