Hi Len,
I guess the question is whether adding secondary group is truly ATLAS specific or if it's a generally available (if seldom utilized) service during account creation. To the extent it's the latter, the Help Desk doesn't have to know anything special about ATLAS. They are simply executing a normal request. I hope we don't get into the practice of questioning whether a person signing knows what he has signed. Cheers.
Charlie
--
Charles C. Young
M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
P.O. Box 20450
Stanford, CA 94309
[log in to unmask]
voice (650) 926 2669
fax (650) 926 2923
CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moss, Leonard J.
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:35 PM
> To: Young, Charles C.
> Cc: Boeheim, Charles T.; Yang, Wei; atlas-sccs-planning-l;
> LeCount, Arla
> Subject: RE: First Draft of the Western Tier 2 web page
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 at 13:55 [-0700], Young, Charles C. wrote:
>
> > This is a much better way of doing it. We will keep the account
> > creation process fairly generic, and won't be asking the
> Help Desk to
> > know anything about ATLAS work space, which is what I
> wanted to avoid.
> >
> > Maybe instead of having the czar add the comment, the ATLAS
> specific
> > instructions can tell the user to do this?
>
> Well, I think that's leaning back towards asking the Help
> Desk to know something special about Atlas procedures. If a
> new user in, say, the GLAST group requested membership in
> some GLAST-related secondary group I'm not certain our Help
> Desk people would simply assume that the czar had really
> noticed that request, and intended to approve it, when he/she
> signed the form. That's just my opinion, though. I think
> this is another issue we should invite Arla to comment on.
>
|