Are there performance gains for our Western T2 consumers because we may be better connected to them than, say, SWT2?
--
Charles C. Young
M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
P.O. Box 20450
Stanford, CA 94309
[log in to unmask]
voice (650) 926 2669
fax (650) 926 2923
CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Yang, Wei
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:52 PM
> To: Stephen J. Gowdy; atlas-sccs-planning-l
> Subject: RE: Minutes of ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 6th Sep 2006
>
> I asked the question of Atlas release pacman mirror at the
> Tier 2/BNL meeting. The respond is that pacman mirror
> provides higher availability and is also faster for local
> users. Nothing else was mentioned.
>
> --
> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Stephen J. Gowdy
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:46 AM
> To: atlas-sccs-planning-l
> Subject: Minutes of ATLAS/SCCS Planning Meeting 6th Sep 2006
>
> - Pacman mirror at SLAC?
>
> Could possibly do this. Need to worry a little about it become a
> too big a load on the services. Need to find out how much load
> this puts on other sites. Not certain why ATLAS needs so many
> mirrors as OSG uses one web server for everything.
> Using FTP as a
> file transfer mechanism would be more efficient but
> don't believe
> that pacman supports that. Will decide after feedback from the
> Tier-2/BNL meeting this morning.
>
>
>
|