By the way:
I did produce dataset with D** reweighting on Saturday and also computed
the S/P correction factors for the no reweighting and for the B/D
reweighting scenarios, and what I have found is that the correction
factors are exactly the same.
Antonio
Concezio Bozzi ha scritto:
> Yes, if corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt has been obtained on a dataset where
> D** have been reweighted to 0.551406. If not, you need to take out
> "-dssRatio 0.551496"
> Ciao, Concezio.
>
> CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
>> Hi Concezio and Antonio, for the stand point of trying to submit jobs
>> for the all weighting scenario, is the following th correct way to
>> submit my jobs;
>> subVirFit.pl -que xlong -opt 1 -b -d -FF=1 -rew 12 -wF
>> sysWd/HFAGCombWin06_3d_0.txt -cm CM2 -debug -Sun -novarfit -small
>> -tmodel -notunbinmes=3 -fixSBratio corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt -countmc
>> -minintpur 0.50 -dssRatio 0.551496 -flag corr_BDFHW_ip050_dss
>> for IP cut = 0.5 and using my .txt file, corr_BDFHweights_ip050.txt?
>> Cheers, C.C.
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Concezio Bozzi wrote:
>>
>>> The VVF command I used in July to determine the D** fraction to be
>>> used in mx unfolded fits is
>>>
>>> ./subVirFit.pl -que kanga -cm CM2 -debug -novarfit -small -tmodel
>>> -notunbinmes=3 -rew 12 -wF sysWd/HFAGCombWin06_3d_0.txt -opt 1
>>> -fitdss 1 -flag fitdss1_nounf_nofixcount -countmc
>>>
>>> -opt 1 sets the 3-parameter fit, -fitdss 1 is used to set the other
>>> component equal to D**lnu decays.
>>>
>>> Concezio.
>>>
>
|