Hi Antonio,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems to me that this D** bug was actually due to an inconsitency
> when producing the dataset files.
> So here is how I proceeded:
>
> - computed the D**+other ratio performing a 3 parameters mx fit (=
> 0.4286+-0.1249).
> - produced dataset with this ratio fixed.
> - computed the S/P ratio for IP > 0.20
>
> now I was running the systematics due to S/P for this IP cut...
>
> I have a question: do I need to reproduce the D**+other ratio for each
> IP cuts (and also datasets for fittest) or can I use the above and just
> cutting on IP when computing S/P?
In principle, you don't need to do this as this must be independent
from the IP cut. If there is time to do it one could of course make
a sanity check for another IP cut.
Cheers,
Heiko
> Antonio
>
>
> Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have not heard any status report since the beginning of the week.
> > It would be good to understand where we stand.
> >
> > Heiko
> >
>
|