http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_pi0/
Plots.
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/VirVubFitter/fittest/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_nopi0/
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
> Hi so look at the spread sheet here;
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_pi0.sxc
>
> These are almost finished
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins.sxc
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/scra/analysis-24/SoverPFullRew_correrr_5bins_nopi0.sxc
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> present: Kerstin, Roberto, Heiko
>>
>> 1) 2-pdf fits performed by Kerstin
>> Look reasonably good for fits with all analysis cuts applied
>> => We will use this for Unfolding
>>
>> 2) Charged and Neutral reweightings
>> Kerstin suggests to determine it on mEs fits with all analysis cuts
>> applied for the unfolding analysis.
>> Reminder: mES fits with only lepton cut do not really work with a 2-pdf
>> model as we know and the re-weighting numbers for BRBR
>> anal¶ysisneed to be determined also on mES fits with only
>> lepton cuts.
>>
>> 3) Roberto will look into mES fits with only lepton cuts when applying
>> a purity cut in order to check if the 2-pdf model can also work on
>> a sample with a lepton cut only.
>>
>> 4) As we know now there are bunch of bugs in SP5/SP6 which significantly
>> influence the analysis in a negative way.
>>
>> The deadline for SP5 production was October 31st and the comupting
>> management was very reluctant to move for us the deadline.
>> The estimate for such a SP5/Sp6 production was O(50 days) which would
>> be very difficult for us as we are stuck without a good D** MC fix.
>>
>> Several people think that the best solution is: Switch to SP8.
>> Spending time to do the switch is better than waiting 50 days
>> where even not all bugs would have been fixed.
>>
>> Consequences are:
>> 1) We need to repeat everything related to systematics.
>> 2) A new analysis release is needed.
>> Kerstin suggests to make a real step which opens the possibility
>> to run TrackFixUp: 20.2.0d
>>
>> Kerstin and Roberto are starting working on getting the analysis
>> run in the new release.
>>
>> If I have forgotten something please let me know.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|