Hi Kerstin,
the trend in the PBRBR as a function of IPcut was observed some time ago. At
that time I believe we did not even use IPcut-dependent S/P ratios, so this
must be due to something else. Of course we should study what's the reason
for that but I believe that the impact on the systematic study done by
Chukwudi should not be affected.
Concezio.
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Per conto di Kerstin
Tackmann
Inviato: giovedì 7 dicembre 2006 23.58
A: CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: B-reco sample
Actually, the instability of PBRBR looks more worrysome than
that of the errors..
Kerstin
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
> Hi all so my webpage has the S/P systematics for the complete Breco
> sample. The numbers for the "no pi0" sample are wrong.
> The numbers can be found using the link at the top of the page.
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/IPsysRelErr.html
> Cheers, C.C.
>
|