Ciao Concezio,
the errors are on the web page:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~lodovico/protected/vub/weights/hybrid.html
(see bottom table), except for the pi(0), where the error is from PDG2007
(HFAG update):
pilnu 1.36 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.07
pi0lnu 0.77 +/- 0.10 +/- 0.07
Cheers,
Francesca
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London |
| E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department |
| Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road |
| Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Bozzi, Concezio wrote:
> Hi Francesca,
> which are the errors on the exclusive BFs you are using?
> Thanks, Concezio.
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Francesca Di Lodovico [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Inviato: lun 11/06/2007 11.39
> A: Bozzi, Concezio
> Cc: vub-recoil
> Oggetto: Re: R: new weights
>
> Ciao Concezio, the motivation for those choices for the BFs can be found
> on the last table in:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~lodovico/protected/vub/weights/hybrid.html
> with respect to which only the pi/pi0lnu BFs have been updated to the
> PDG07 (HFAG averages).
> The central values for mb and a comes from hep-ex/0507253 (Oliver's and
> Henning's paper), see the first line below the first table.
> I will update the web page with the new weights once ready.
>
> I thought this was the decision we reached at the meeting last week, if
> not, could you please let me know what should I change?
> Thanks,
> Francesca
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London |
> | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department |
> | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road |
> | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Concezio Bozzi wrote:
>
>> Hi Francesca,
>> thanks. There are also some (minor) differences in the exclusive BF with
>> respect to what we were using so far, e.g. the rho BFs. I guess this is
>> because the numbers were taken directly from the SP8 generation values.
>>
>> We took from SP8 also the values for the inclusive BFs - 0.001892 for
>> B+->Xulnu, 0.001948 for B0->Xulnu - which you updated to 0.002304 and
>> 0.002220 respectively.
>>
>> Another difference regards m_b (4.62 -> 4.6586) and a(2.27 -> 1.32669).
>> Could you clarify this?
>>
>> Thanks, ciao, Concezio.
>>
>>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>>> Da: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-vub-
>>> [log in to unmask]] Per conto di Francesca Di Lodovico
>>> Inviato: luned́ 11 giugno 2007 10.17
>>> A: [log in to unmask]
>>> Oggetto: new weights
>>>
>>> Hi, the file with the new weights (for the main configuration) can be
>>> found in:
>>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/%7Elodovico/protected/vub/weights/weightsB/ne
>>> w_weightfile_ellipse1_w1_exp_B.txt
>>>
>>> The only difference with respect to before is in the pi(0)lnu final
>>> state. The BF's correspond to the PDG 07 value (ie based on all the
>>> published measurements). The other BF's are the same then before, as there
>>> isn't any new published measurement since then.
>>>
>>> During this week, I will produce the weight files also for the
>>> configurations related to the systematics.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Francesca
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London |
>>> | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department |
>>> | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road |
>>> | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK |
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|