Hi Ray:
Here is a few from me. I only got to the bottom of page 5.
Abstract:
"Here ccbar indicates" get rid of here.
Main boday:
34) "easiest"? not good English.
42) I am not sure how the cancelation works and where the 17% comes from.
65) signal sideband is jargon.
76) having -> with, and I think you probably do not need these much
details on the number of hits and angle.
88) Again, I think you do not have to list the angle.
93) These candidates are subsequently assigned a nominal pi0 mass...
100) just curious: how big is the sigma here for hte decay-length? in
terms of centimeters?
Minliang
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Ray F. Cowan wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just a reminder--we were assigned BAD 1808, version 11 to review (due Feb 24,
> yesterday). If you can send me your comments today, I will combine and post
> them tonight.
>
> Thanks,
> --Ray
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:43:48 -0800 (PST)
> From: Ray F. Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: BAD 1808, v22 institutional review, due Feb 24
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We seem to have missed an institutional review assignment for MIT:
> BAD 1808, version 11, comments due on Feb 24 (Sunday).
>
> I apologize for the short notice. I wonder if you could take a look at
> version 11 at
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/babar-internal/BAD/doc/detail.html?docNum=1808
>
> and send me comments by midnight Eastern time, Sunday, Feb 24? Then I'll
> combine and post them as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> --Ray
>
>
>
|