Hi Andy and all,
since the last call I had a look at several existing project policies and it seems to me that
classical major.minor.patch structure should work well and most users will
have a reasonable expectation what a version change means. For a more formal definition
of the change semantics in each number we could maybe adapt eg the simple approach
described on
http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
Cheers, Dirk
On 17 Sep 2010, at 02:52, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> From our last meeting we had an action item to come up with the svs (simple
> versioning scheme). I have not seen any suggestions and it's getting to the
> point we need a scheme pretty soon if we are to release a new version. So
> please go at it!
>
> Andy
>
|