Hi Lukasz,
Is there any automated testing in addition to the building?
I was on an airplane today and found there are a few things (such as XrdSecssl) that don't work on Mac OS X with autotools. Our Mac builds produce *.dylib, while the XrdCryptoFactory assumes *.so.
Additionally, the linker on the Mac didn't like the resulting libXrdOfs (it had a few missing symbols which are in libXrdOss but weren't linked).
So, everything built fine, but I couldn't even start up a simple test case.
Brian
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Lukasz Janyst wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Derek Feichtinger
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Autotools would have been an ideal solution for a multiarchitecture build
>> test system with a common source tree on a shared FS. I had proposed that at
>> this time. But the tools age, and I do not think that the autotools build
>> has any backup inside of the xrootd developers. So I am also a bit reluctant
>> to put more time into it at this stage.
>
> Actually, I would like to migrate to CMake, but I don't really have
> time to look into that at the moment. I use autotools because it
> supports parallel building and that makes a really big difference my
> quad core development box :)
>
>> But I can have a look at your build and try to help for this problem,
>> naturally.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> What do you see when you run ./config.guess inside the top directory on your
>> SUN machine?
>> Can you send me the config.log and config.status that is produced after you
>> have run configure?
>
> Well, it builds fine on SPARC, but it doesn't on i386. The files
> are attached.
>
> Thanks,
> Lukasz
> <config.status.gz><config.log.gz>
|