Hi Lukasz,
ok, let's have a chat with Steve about this and then reestablish the contact to Mattias. Fixing bugs and not getting the fixed version out somewhat limiting.
Cheers, Dirk
On 02.11.2011, at 18:47, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Steve Traylen is the responsible for lxplus installations and he
> prefers taking the packages from EPEL. He has very good reasons for
> that: the ROOT version from EPEL is built against the xrootd version
> from EPEL and taking xrootd from different source caused problems in
> the past. I cannot forward you the exchange with Mattias because there
> was none. He has never responded to any of my emails.
>
> Cheers,
> Lukasz
>
> 2011/11/2 Dirk Duellmann <[log in to unmask]>:
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> that sounds odd. Who decides on lxplus deployment if not us? If epel is now on the critical path for lxplus - when did that happen? please also forward me you last exchange with mattias.
>>
>> Cheers, Dirk
>>
>>
>> On 02.11.2011, at 18:32, "Lukasz Janyst" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #83628 (project xrootd):
>>>
>>> This is actually a whole another story. The version on lxplus is picked up
>>> from EPEL (for various reasons) and Mattias is not responding to my emails.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Reply to this item at:
>>>
>>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?83628>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
>>> http://savannah.cern.ch/
>>>
>>
|