HPS-Proposal2014-v3 exists and should be used for the proposal. Described
on Confluence, see below.
https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Working+with+detector+geometry
I've moved many of the recent (made in the last couple of months)
geometries into a sandbox, so LCIO files that rely on those detectors will
no longer run unless you manually copy the geometries back into
hps-detectors/detectors. This is intentional and meant to kick people off
of those (bogus) detectors; we're not going to do this every time we make
a new detector.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Sho Uemura wrote:
> Yes. That's the right way to do it.
>
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Maruyama, Takashi wrote:
>
>> Sho,
>> To maintain the chicane configuration, the PS magnetic field strength will
>> be 0.25 Tesla at 1.1 GeV, 0.5 Tesla at 2.2 GeV, and 1.5 Tesla at 6.6 GeV.
>> Is the field set correctly in the new detector geometry? A foolproof way
>> might be prepare three detectors like "HPSDetector_for_1.1GeV" using
>> correct field map.
>> Takashi
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|