Ok, that is great news!  There are some debugging developments
that haven't really finished, that might be good to continue.

We would like the first set, ccqserv001-ccqserv050.  We especially
need the first master machine ccqserv001, since all the dev. work
has been done on that one.

Let me take a look at the "first" set of machines again, I might want
to get something off the master there, but probably not.  But after
that I don't see us needing that set of machines.

Thanks -

Douglas


On 09/23/2013 01:06 AM, Fabrice Jammes wrote:
> Hello Daniel, Douglas, Jacek, and Serge,
>
> Good news ! CC-IN2P3 agree to keep 50 machines running permanently for
> Qserv development purpose.
> Here's two questions from Rachid Lemrani about these remaining machines
> at CC-IN2P3 :
>
> - Do you havea preference on the set of machines to keep (in ccqserv set
> {001 .. 320}), or can the CC-IN2P3 engineers choose it
> themselves(depending on racks for example)?
> - Do you still need the"first" installed qserv machines (ccqserv {01 ..
> 15})?Can it be stopped ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabrice
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1