LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  December 2013

QSERV-L December 2013

Subject:

Re: Fwd: [HSC Forum] "Installing virtualenv with eups"

From:

Kian-Tat Lim <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:01:31 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (44 lines)

Fabrice et al.,

	I think we're moving towards having eups and the entire LSST
stack use the system Python (and numpy and scipy and possibly astropy).
So your option 1 (which is what the LSST stack currently uses) will go
away.  I'm not yet sure if we will want virtualenv (your option 3); I
think most probably not.

> I see at least 3 solutions :
> 
> 1. re-building python : it's a bit awkward because eups already needs python
> and this implies python is already installed on the environnement
> before installing eups.
> Furthermore, if eups install a python version it is not compatible
> with, it will nevertheless swith to use
> it (instead of system python) and then fails.
> 
> 2. use systemp python : there's example file in HSC build script.
> The problem with this solution
> is that the install tool may have to manage conflict between system
> python libs and eups-installed python libs.
> 
> 3. use virtualenv : i think it's a good solution, but eups can't do
> this at the moment.
> 
> Maybe it would be a good idea to make eups always run with system
> python, indeed it would solve point 1. and 3.
> I can test quickly if it work by updating eups source (in peculiar
> eups executable which invoke python), and them put a ticket so that
> eups install tools take in account this improvment.
> 
> If this solution is too complicated, i will then try point 2.
> 
> Do you think this proposal is reasonable ?

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask]

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use