LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  March 2014

QSERV-L March 2014

Subject:

Re: jira

From:

Kian-Tat Lim <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:29:29 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Jacek,

	The general idea is that we should use terminology in the way it
is by the outside community.

> I heard epics are things that take longer than 2-3 weeks, and
> stories should be some smaller things: days to ~2-3 weeks long.

	It's not really about the time.  It's more that an epic is an
open-ended collection of stories, while each story should be
very clearly defined in terms of scope.  But, as Daniel says, epics
shouldn't be so open-ended that you don't know what belongs in them;
they should still produce some kind of useful result.

> But I was assured by both Mario and KT
> that we should have both stories and epics in qserv.

	You almost certainly should, unless you fully understand
everything you are going to be doing.

	Depending on how we run things, you may even want different
sprints.

> >Thinly veiled behind the jira switch is really a wholesale switch to
> >agile in terms of planning, organizing, and executing work. If we're not
> >switching, we should ignore epics and stories, no?

	Not thinly; this is an explicit desire.

> >"Qserv Design week II" sounds like it should be a label or a "story".
> >Probably a label. The things we want to treat and cover over the week
> >have their own lifetimes, with a specific thing we hope to accomplish
> >during qdw2. i.e., For DM-56, the task for qdw2 might be "evaluate
> >current css implementation and integration".

	The first thing that comes to my mind is that this might make
sense as a different sprint (which would need its own board, separate
from the DM Software Development board).

> >>I took liberty to come up with a few "epics", and now it is
> >>time to get your opinion (including K-T's!) if that makes
> >>sense... it is basically:
> >>    - hackathon
> >>    - major refactoring of all qserv code (it is a big one!)

	I'd probably break this down into refactoring of individual
components, or, if cross-component integration is important, break it
down into testable pieces.

> >>    - fully automated testbed
> >>    - logging
> >>    - configuration

	These seem OK if they really are going to take a long time or
are not fully understood yet.

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask]

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use