Jacek,
> Nope! It is not the "set" query. I run it by hand,
> and I got:
>
> SET @@session.autocommit = 1;
>
> +------------------------------------------+
> | no-field-name |
> +------------------------------------------+
> | Ignoring meaningless command (in Qserv). |
> +------------------------------------------+
>
> and after that Qserv was happily running.
It's possible that actually returning something is the problem;
the SET should usually not return anything.
--
Kian-Tat Lim, LSST Data Management, [log in to unmask]
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
|