> On 15 Jan 2015, at 00:57, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Yes Serge is completely right, Scientific Linux 7 is what we prefer, sorry for the typo.
Concerning this particular request, do you need SL7 on the three dev/building nodes ccqserv00[4-6] as well?
>
>
> On 01/14/2015 03:30 PM, Serge Monkewitz wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's what Qserv team would like to have on the cluster, in addition to what we have defined previously:
>>>
>>> - Scientific Linux on all node, in order to get C++11 support
>>> [snip]
>> To be more precise: if possible, we would prefer Scientific Linux 7 over earlier versions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Serge
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
>
>
---
Yvan Calas
CC-IN2P3 -- Storage Group
21 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin
CS70202
F-69627 Villeurbanne Cedex
Tel: +33 4 72 69 41 73
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
|