Hi Paul,
So does that mean you did not also write the C++ version? If so, who did?
Andy
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Paul Millar wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 14/06/18 14:42, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
>> I wouldn't think it should be a problem. Certainly, dCache has a vested
>> interest in making this a clean package for maintainability as well as
>> making it easily usable to widen the deployment. Paul?
>
> In general, yes. However, in dCache, we're not depending on libmacaroons.
> We're using a pure java implementation instead: jmacaroons.
>
> Also, in Java it's more common to simply deliver the dependencies with the
> application, as jar files, rather than depending on platform-supplied
> libraries.
>
> There's also a central repository of jar files from which dependencies are
> pulled during built time, so there's also no need to embed them within the
> source-code.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
|