That's correct. I've been primarily analyzing FEEs, trying to reduce the effects of multiple scattering and also trying to get decent shower development/spread in the ECal to get a good position measurement.
Norman
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Nelson, Timothy Knight
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]; hps-software <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: ECal-SVT relative alignment
Shoot… sorry… Norman’s message said FEEs, not yours.
Tim
> On Feb 25, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 25, 2019, at 15:38, Nelson, Timothy Knight <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Our data is totally different, especially for FEE, which is what you are looking at here.
>
> Who’s looking at FEE’s? Maybe you’re looking at different plots?
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|