I agree, this would be a good time actually.
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> If no one is running now I’d say go for it.
>
>> On Aug 31, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Scicomp is ready to move HPS to a new /work (not the one in the counting house) fileserver with increased performance and space.
>>
>> This will require switching it to read-only for a final rsync and then the switch will happen. That should take a total of 30 minutes, and meanwhile people/jobs trying to write to /work/hallb/hps will have problems.
>>
>> I don't see anything currently on the batch farm for HPS. I'm tempted to let them go forward with this ASAP unless people yell. Not an ideal time for this, but I requested they do HPS first since we have most to benefit for the upcoming run.
>>
>> -Nathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
|