VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
14 Sep 2006 01:44:45 +0100 (BST)Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:44:45 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
Good point(s).

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> since we do not see the second bin being high anymore for an integrated
> purity cut >0.4, maybe a linear fit would just work fine here?
> Of course cutting on integrated purity will cost us statistics, but maybe
> we should get smaller uncertainties from the correction procedure.
>
> Cheers,
> Kerstin
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Chukwudi Kweku Clarke wrote:
>
>> Hi all, Kerstin noted something of interest in Antonio's talk. Please see
>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/IPartifactVVF.pdf
>> Cheers, C.C.
>>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2