VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heiko Lacker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
12 Jun 2006 15:33:26 +0200 (CEST)Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:33:26 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (38 lines)
Any idea what the reason for the larger error is?

Heiko

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>     I've completed the B/D BR systematics. The table below shows the 
> numbers.
> 
>   		B	  D
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.55  | 2.69%    | 2.93% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.625 | 3.22%    | 1.81% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.7   | 3.27%    | 2.06% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.7   | 6.58%    | 1.70% |
> q2 > 8     |          |       |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> P+ < 0.66  | 3.19%    | 1.41% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.55  | 2.47%    | 1.70% |
> babar SF   |          |	      |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> 
> There is an increase in the 2D analysis: last years we had 0.74% for the 
> D BR and 4.88% for B SL BR.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Antonio
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2