VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Antonio Petrella <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
21 Jun 2006 16:06:04 +0200Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:06:04 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Hi Heiko,

Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> Hi Antonio,
> 
> thanks a lot for the update.
> 
> We talk to you soon.
> 
> The next steps from my point of view are:
> 1) What are the corresponding peak/signal ratios?

This is on the web page too. I've uploaded a couple of minutes ago.

> 2) Compare the ratios with what we find from fits
>    on the depleted sample on data

For depleted sample do you mean a dataset without charged/neutral kaons? 
What kind of selection... semileptonic or all cuts?

> 3) Look for differences between charged and neutral B's
>    on MC and data wrt:
>    a) relative ratio
>    b) shape parameters of the peaking BG PDF
> 
For charged and neutral B's I probably don't have the datasets, so I 
have to produce them first.

bye,
	Antonio

> Cheers,
> Heiko
> 
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have update the usual page with scans
>>
>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~petrella/mesfits/mesfits.html
>>
>> talk to you later,
>>   Antonio
>>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2