Hoi,
the following is my summary of the decisions (to be) taken, please
post corrections as followups.
Tracks/Photons
--------------
We focus on GTVL/AS, taking care not to eliminate Ks daughters. CT/AS
is the obvious fallback solution.
Smearing
--------
30% increase in resolution for SP3 tracks. No smearing for SP4 tracks
yet. This is based on exclusive reconstruction, may (or not) be
appropriate for inclusive Mx.
For neutrals: SP3: 2.5% killing and 1.5% smearing. On SP4: 2%
smearing and a shift of -0.0075, no killing. That should give at
least a first order approximation to the real resolutions.
Will solve the technical problem of (not) applying smearing today.
Data set
--------
Status quo, i.e. R8 for Run 1.
MC sample
---------
Combine SP4 and SP3 for Run1. Plots to be posted on the agreement
between the SP4RUN1 and SP4RUN2.
Mx cut
------
We all agree that we need to show the result when varying the mxhad
cut. We discussed on whether or not we take a decision before
unblinding on how we choose this: (1) significance of the result, (2)
overall goodness of fit. While avoiding a bias, we also need to avoid
any model-dependence answer present in the MC. In the end we agreed
that the discussion is not yet over, but that we don't disagree too
strongly ...
Ks mass
-------
Status quo
K+ momentum
-----------
Apply the momentum correction, show the change, apply no lower cut on
the momentum.
Next Meeting
------------
Sometime Monday. Conflicts between Rome and PAC/AWG meeting. Need to
discuss the BAD then. The review committee would like to see the BAD
before our next review meeting, and would like to have it for a
minimum of two days to digest it.
Cheers,
--U.
> From: Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Urs Langenegger <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]>,
> Daniele delRe <[log in to unmask]>,
> Review of Vub Breco -- Franz Muheim <[log in to unmask]>,
> Marie-Helene Schune <[log in to unmask]>,
> Stephane Willocq <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Review starting up again
> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:13:53 +0100 (BST)
>
> Hoi Urs,
>
> The review committee is in favour of getting ythe new BAD abefore the
> meeting. But we need a minimum fo two days, so that we can devote enough
> time for reading it.
>
>
> We are alos concerned that the final BAD will be available before the
> last possible date 21. June. This allows for no slippage at all.
>
> We really would prefer to obtain the new BAD next Monday with the aim
> of having a final document one week later, provided there are no problems.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Franz
|