VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heiko Lacker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
16 May 2006 19:05:23 +0200 (CEST)Tue, 16 May 2006 19:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
Hi,

the next steps concerning the mES fit after having seen that the signal 
yield is not stable against adding non-BBbar BG are:

1) For the MC fit including non-BBbar events:
   Provide scaled signal yield numbers such that we can compare the 
   fit result directly with the expected numer of signal events

2) Check if we get the same shape parameters for the peaking BG pdf
   when adding the non-BBbar MC events

3) Compare the ratio and mES shape between continuum MC and combinatoric 
   BBbar MC with what we see when comparing offpeak with onpeak data.

4) Phone meeting on Thursday, 13:00, European time.
   Participants so far: Antonio, Wolfgang, Heiko

   I'll call them. If there are more participants please let me
   know until tomorrow. In this case, I'll set up a phone conference.

5) Did I forget something?

Cheers,
Heiko



ATOM RSS1 RSS2