Hoi Daniele
In Alessio's posting, the breakdown into superblocks is missing. I
find the following:
Updated
IBU
chains
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> original TS Ibu TS dupli Ibu TS
>
>Dstar :
33376 > sub1 47755 32921 1618
271710 > sub2 335800 223109 11992
150254 > sub3 234785 181374 18342
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
455340 618340
>Dc :
21002 > sub1 27987 41053 1357
368848 > sub2 399950 480601 19297
1198129 > sub3 1359859 1011040 16872
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1587979 1787796
>Dstar0:
12814 > sub1 19936 28914 9
243090 > sub2 274420 308806 192
1171574 > sub3 1298478 1046507 420
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1427478 1592834
>D0 :
38636 > sub1 53553 9754
563393 > sub2 625498 32365
1314534 > sub3 1472164 1412533
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1916563 2151215
My (summed) yields are consistent with Alessio's different summed
yields (they'd better be, we use the same chains).
In summary, we usually have 88-90% of the 'original TS' yields for the
sum of all modes, except in the case of dstar (73%). sub1 has much
lower yields in all seeds on IBU level.
We should discuss the implications of this situation for production.
Cheers,
--U.
|
