actually even the mm2 scan for the new selection is not the same as in the
BAD. May you send me your fit output files? I will try to rerun the fit
and compare.
Daniele
>
> in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/011603/ you'll observe
> that the mm2 scan is not quite the same as in July even for the old
> track/photon selection. Trk3Gam0 screws the B+ in the mm2 scan badly,
> while the B0 are decent (better than the current B+). This was
> different in July, where the B+ scans both in mx and mm2 were stable.
>
> I would not say that this increases my confidence in any physics-
> inspired explanation.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>
|