Any idea what the reason for the larger error is?
Heiko
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've completed the B/D BR systematics. The table below shows the
> numbers.
>
> B D
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.55 | 2.69% | 2.93% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.625 | 3.22% | 1.81% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.7 | 3.27% | 2.06% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.7 | 6.58% | 1.70% |
> q2 > 8 | | |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> P+ < 0.66 | 3.19% | 1.41% |
> -----------|----------|-------|
> mx < 1.55 | 2.47% | 1.70% |
> babar SF | | |
> -----------|----------|-------|
>
> There is an increase in the 2D analysis: last years we had 0.74% for the
> D BR and 4.88% for B SL BR.
>
> cheers,
>
> Antonio
>
|